The greatest scam by Project IC and yet all CRIMINALS in Government Federal and State tolerated and co- horted with them!!!!! --- Joshua
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Sabah RCI: 'Suluk intruders would have backed off if I were sultan'
Self-proclaimed Sabah sultan Mohd Akjan Ali Muhammad said the Suluk
intruders would have backed off from their claim on Sabah had he been
made sultan of the state.
Akjan (left) told the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) on immigrants in Sabah that the intruders’ general Agbimuddin Kiram from the defunct Sulu sultanate had met him prior to their incursion on Sabah.
“When Datu Agbi came - in February if I am not mistaken - he had appealed to me to become the sultan of Sabah.
“I made an agreement with them that they would drop their claim on Sabah if I became sultan,” he testified at the Kota Kinabalu Court Complex.
Akjan said he had then conveyed this agreement to the police but they had ignored him.
“To save Sabah, I was prepared to become its sultan but the police officer I told about this did not inform his higher-ups,” he said.
By Nigel Aw
http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=86433
Kota Kinabalu: The assertion by Datu Akjan Ali Mohammad that
Suluks are "first class natives" is a gross manipulation of definition
and highly mischievous, misleading and misconceived, said State Reform
Party (Star) Chief, Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan.
He said this is because nowhere is this stated in the Interpretation (Definition of Native) Ordinance (Sabah Cap. 64),
Dr Jeffrey said Akjan was again in one of his inventive modes, creating all sorts of lies to confuse Sabahans.
"As I have been inundated with many telephone calls from my constituents who are very unhappy with Akjan's reference to Suluks as first class natives of Sabah, I have to make a defence for true Sabahan natives," he said.
According to him, Section 2 (1) (a) of the ordinance states that any person both of whose parents are or were members of a people indigenous to Sabah could be considered as original, pure.
"Or first natives because there was no need for them to make an application to the Native Court for the Native Certificate or Sijil Anak Negeri," he said.
"Now the exact text of Section 2 (1) © quoted by Akjan states that 'any person who is ordinarily resident in Sabah, is a member of the Suluk, Kagayan, Simonol, Sibutu or Ubian people or of a people indigenous to the State of Sarawak or State of Brunei, has lived as and been a member of a native community for a continuous period of three years preceding the date of his claim to be native, has borne a good character throughout that period and whose stay in Sabah is not limited under any of the provisions of the Immigration Act.'
"The person described here must, therefore, fulfill the requirement of:
"(1) ordinarily resident (not transient); (2) has lived as member of a native community for continuous period of three years, and; (3) of good character and not illegal (in compliance with Immigration law)."
Dr Jeffrey stressed that a further requirement is that such person can only claim to be a native upon being declared by the Native Court as provided under Section 2(3) which states that:
"No claim by any person to be a native by virtue of the provisions of paragraph (b), (c) and (d) of subsection (1) shall be recognised as valid unless supported by an appropriate declaration made by a Native Court under Section 3."
"With due respect, all those claiming to be natives under section 2(1) (b), (c) and (d) of the Interpretation (Definition of Native) Ordinance must apply to the Native Court who shall make the requisite declaration with the issuance of the Native Certificate.
"Let me emphasise for those in categories (b), (c) and (d) above only when they have in their possession the Native Certificates will they have the legal standing to call themselves natives.
"As such Akjan is wrong in making a blanket definition that all Suluks are natives, let alone first class natives.
Under the meaning of true natives or indigenous people, Suluks are definitely not within the list of Sabah's indigenous peoples, or original peoples."
Akjan (left) told the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) on immigrants in Sabah that the intruders’ general Agbimuddin Kiram from the defunct Sulu sultanate had met him prior to their incursion on Sabah.
“When Datu Agbi came - in February if I am not mistaken - he had appealed to me to become the sultan of Sabah.
“I made an agreement with them that they would drop their claim on Sabah if I became sultan,” he testified at the Kota Kinabalu Court Complex.
Akjan said he had then conveyed this agreement to the police but they had ignored him.
“To save Sabah, I was prepared to become its sultan but the police officer I told about this did not inform his higher-ups,” he said.
By Nigel Aw
http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=86433
'Misleading statement by Akjan'
Published on: Sunday, August 18, 2013
|
He said this is because nowhere is this stated in the Interpretation (Definition of Native) Ordinance (Sabah Cap. 64),
Dr Jeffrey said Akjan was again in one of his inventive modes, creating all sorts of lies to confuse Sabahans.
"As I have been inundated with many telephone calls from my constituents who are very unhappy with Akjan's reference to Suluks as first class natives of Sabah, I have to make a defence for true Sabahan natives," he said.
According to him, Section 2 (1) (a) of the ordinance states that any person both of whose parents are or were members of a people indigenous to Sabah could be considered as original, pure.
"Or first natives because there was no need for them to make an application to the Native Court for the Native Certificate or Sijil Anak Negeri," he said.
"Now the exact text of Section 2 (1) © quoted by Akjan states that 'any person who is ordinarily resident in Sabah, is a member of the Suluk, Kagayan, Simonol, Sibutu or Ubian people or of a people indigenous to the State of Sarawak or State of Brunei, has lived as and been a member of a native community for a continuous period of three years preceding the date of his claim to be native, has borne a good character throughout that period and whose stay in Sabah is not limited under any of the provisions of the Immigration Act.'
"The person described here must, therefore, fulfill the requirement of:
"(1) ordinarily resident (not transient); (2) has lived as member of a native community for continuous period of three years, and; (3) of good character and not illegal (in compliance with Immigration law)."
Dr Jeffrey stressed that a further requirement is that such person can only claim to be a native upon being declared by the Native Court as provided under Section 2(3) which states that:
"No claim by any person to be a native by virtue of the provisions of paragraph (b), (c) and (d) of subsection (1) shall be recognised as valid unless supported by an appropriate declaration made by a Native Court under Section 3."
"With due respect, all those claiming to be natives under section 2(1) (b), (c) and (d) of the Interpretation (Definition of Native) Ordinance must apply to the Native Court who shall make the requisite declaration with the issuance of the Native Certificate.
"Let me emphasise for those in categories (b), (c) and (d) above only when they have in their possession the Native Certificates will they have the legal standing to call themselves natives.
"As such Akjan is wrong in making a blanket definition that all Suluks are natives, let alone first class natives.
Under the meaning of true natives or indigenous people, Suluks are definitely not within the list of Sabah's indigenous peoples, or original peoples."
No comments:
Post a Comment